Methodology
How We Research, Review and Correct This Site
Content here is written and reviewed by the MaxDex Services team in Melbourne, Australia. These are the rules we hold ourselves to, published so you can hold us to them.
Who writes and reviews this content?
Short answer
The MaxDex Services team, the same people who build the app. Product and methodology pages are reviewed against the shipping source code, not against marketing copy, and carry the date of their last review.
We do not employ clinicians and we do not present the team as medically qualified. Where a claim needs clinical authority we cite published research and link to it, rather than asserting it in our own voice.
How are claims sourced?
Short answer
Any claim carrying a number, a mechanism or a research finding is linked to a primary source — preferably a DOI, PubMed record, or government or academic publication — rather than a secondary summary.
Where a statement describes our own implementation, the source is the code itself, and the relevant constants are published so the claim can be checked rather than taken on faith. Where we have not measured something, we say we have not measured it.
We do not cite internal documents that readers cannot access. An unverifiable citation is worse than none, because it borrows the appearance of evidence without supplying any.
Related
How often is content reviewed?
Short answer
Methodology pages are reviewed whenever the underlying engine changes, since a stale constant here is a false statement. Other pages are reviewed periodically and carry a visible last-reviewed date.
A last-reviewed date only means something if it changes when the content does. We update it on substantive review, not on every deploy, so it is not inflated into a freshness signal that means nothing.
Our editorial and integrity standards
Short answer
Every factual claim, formula, and constant published on this site is drawn directly from our implementation or linked to peer-reviewed scientific literature.
We prioritize transparency: where you see a metric, formula, or time constant, it is drawn directly from the production code or linked to a primary source.
We also clearly position MaxDex as a productivity system rather than a clinical medical treatment. The full boundary is set out in what we do not claim.
How do I report an error?
Short answer
Email maxdexaiservices@gmail.com with the page and the specific claim. Substantive corrections are made to the page and its last-reviewed date updated.
Corrections to methodology pages are the ones we most want to hear about. If a published constant no longer matches the shipping app, that is a factual error on our part, and we would rather fix it quickly than have it quietly rot.
Frequently asked questions
Who is behind MaxDex?
Does MaxDex use AI to write this content?
Is the medical information here reviewed by a clinician?
Last reviewed August 28, 2026 by the MaxDex Services team. How we research and review this.